Tube trains
Whilst waiting for a tube train, I wondered why instead of one very long train every 5-10mins they don’t run short trains more frequently. Historically, longer trains would be more efficient – fewer drivers required and because you need to leave gaps between trains, the throughput is higher.
Of course these days we have automated trains so using this approach:
* shorter wait for trains
* less crowding on the platform (probably)
* it’s automated so no chaos caused by strikes
* shorter platforms – less distance to walk, cheaper stations
* more flexible trains – they could go to a wider selection of destinations (and more directly)
* with shorter trains if one breaks down you could possibly get another train to shunt it gently into a layby
There are a few disadvantages:
* automatic systems are often complex and require more rigorous safety measures than manned systems
* train efficiency may well be lower
* passenger safety (from other passengers)
I’m sure it’s already been thought of many times before, so why hasn’t it been done? The advantages seem huge compared to current systems.
Posted: December 13th, 2009 under Idea.
Comments: 1
Comment from Stu Teasdale
Time: Saturday 26 December, 2009, 14:52
Well the DLR is unmanned and the drivers on the vicotria line do nothing. TBH the major blocker here is the RMT demanding a certain level of manning on the trains, even though they do nothing particularly useful.